Архив сайта
Август 2020 (13)
Июль 2020 (32)
Июнь 2020 (34)
Май 2020 (35)
Апрель 2020 (31)
Март 2020 (33)
Календарь
«    Август 2020    »
ПнВтСрЧтПтСбВс
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ НА САЙТЕ
Какая страна, на Ваш взгляд, примет больше беженцев-черкесов из Сирии?
Российская Федерация
Соединенные Штаты Америки
Ни та, ни другая
СМС-помощь


Аслан Шаззо на сервере Стихи.ру
The to the USA state secretary assistant on European affairs Rosemary de Carlo in the interview to the Russian newspaper «Kommersant» on January 30th, 2006 declared about «uniqueness» of the case with determination of the status of Kosovo – in the case of rather probable finding by the region of independence from Serbia and Montenegro - for the «frozen» conflicts on the post-Soviet space.

Today the president of Russia Vladimir Putin started his correspondence polemic with the USA, having noted that - - the decision on the status of Kosovo might be considered legal if it was "universal" and could be used anywhere in the post-Soviet space.

Political observers refer in their opinion that in that polemic actually there was a speech that the West, Kosovo’s supporter, was ready to give it independence from Serbia but so that the precedent not could not be used by not recognized states of the former USSR. Under request of IА REGNUM the head of the Fund "Free Europe" Sergey Stepenkov commented on the position of Rosemary de Carlo:

"You might be very often convinced in how much right was the author of the saying that the devil disappears in details. Simple and clear at first sight logic at the close analysis at times leads to some unexpected conclusions. So that occurred to the interview of de Carlo. She refers to the "uniqueness" of the situation in Kosovo that as a result of Yugoslavia’s violent disintegration had reached its critical stage.

The international community, as de Carlo considers, was compelled to arrange for stabilization the situation in Kosovo because Milosevic had broken the resolution of the Security Council of the United Nations № 1244. Other not recognized republics - in the territory of the former USSR (Pridnestrovie, South Ossetia, Abkhazia), possessing practically all the attributes of their statehood (except for the international recognition), the American diplomat refuses in right to have independence, as "they were not applied with the UN resolutions".

And here the logic de Carlo gives the obvious failure. From her statements paradoxical and tragic "advice" of the USA to the not recognized states on the post-Soviet space arises: the USA would recognized them the same as Kosovo in case when they had achieved independence and the international recognition through bloody conflicts, victims, humanitarian catastrophes and intervention of the United Nations realized with NATO’s hands.

For this purpose they have to follow the Kosovan script: to provoke their "big" neighbour (for Abkhazia it will be Georgia, for Pridnestrovie - Moldova) for intervention that would cause numerous victims among peace population and tens thousand refugees; to wait for adoption of resolutions of Security Council of the United Nations, - and to wait for NATO...

And then the world community mediated by NATO, will deign to get closely engaged in determination of the status of the republics. Here is this advice - new blood for the sake of NATO. Whether Rosemary de Carlo wished to appear the author of "settlement through new war" - I really do not know. But it looks so".

IА REGNUM
Опубликовал administrator, 30-01-2006, 17:02. Просмотров: 1844
Другие новости по теме:
S. Shamba: in case of Kosovo’s recognition, Abkhazia would achieve the same ...
United Nations Court’s verdict on Kosovo: will there be a parade of soverei ...
MFA of Abkhazia: The USA use double standers policy
The EU’s political situation – Sergey Shamba
US "Kosovan variations" for Abkhazia and South Ossetia