Архив сайта
Июнь 2018 (1)
Май 2018 (10)
Апрель 2018 (10)
Март 2018 (10)
Февраль 2018 (11)
Январь 2018 (12)
Календарь
«    Ноябрь 2018    »
ПнВтСрЧтПтСбВс
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ НА САЙТЕ
Какая страна, на Ваш взгляд, примет больше беженцев-черкесов из Сирии?
Российская Федерация
Соединенные Штаты Америки
Ни та, ни другая
СМС-помощь


Аслан Шаззо на сервере Стихи.ру
Deputies of KBR parliament supported the offer of the public prosecutor of republic and brought a legislative initiative about amendments to the Criminal-remedial code of Russian Federation, correspondent IА REGNUM reported.

They suggest excluding cases of special character from area of affairs considered with jurymen’s participation. These are the crimes stipulated by clauses 205, 208 (part.1), 209, 278, 279 of the Criminal Code of Russian Federation.

"Legal practice testifies that jurymen for some reasons are not ready for fair verdict, especially in a small national republic", - so the deputies had motivate their decision.

The vice-president of the parliament committee on legislation Ruslan Abazov (who represented the document’s project) assured deputies that the offered changes "do not contradict any constitutional laws and guarantees of citizens". Besides Abazov noted, they would help to toughen struggle against terrorism, gangsterism, and attempts of violent capture of authority.

Ruslan Abazov reminded deputies that in 2005 in Supreme Court of KBR jurymen had recognized innocent a group of four persons connected with djamaat "Jarmuk" in encroachment for life of militia employees.

The last case with jurymen’s participation had been considered in the Supreme Court of KBR in December 2005 and concerned the charge of participants of the attack the Management of the State narcocontrol of Russian Federation on KBR. Then two from among the five accused - Etgulov and Mirzoev were recognized by the jurymen innocent and were released in the court hall.

"We categorically do not agree with such changes in the Constitution, they are inadmissible, - the director of Kabardino-Balkarian legal expert center Valery Hatazhukov told in his comment to IА REGNUM correspondent. - All these references to mentality and some national features of the small republic are lie, a cover for the real problem.

And the problem is that the institute of jurymen like no other court reveals defects of the Office of Public Prosecutor. In a jury any forged cases are ruined in ashes; they nake full incompetence of the investigatory bodies. Here is the real reason of desire of the Office of Public Prosecutor to not allow jurymen taking part in any serious cases".

IА REGNUM
Опубликовал administrator, 18-02-2006, 14:07. Просмотров: 809
Другие новости по теме:
Kabardino-Balkarian Office of Public Prosecutor doubts objectivity and prof ...
Public of KBR opposed restrictions for jury
Parliament of Kabardino-Balkaria suggested toughening Russian antiterrorist ...
Public prosecutor of Karachaevo-Circassia requested date of Cherkessk mayor ...
Changes in the constitution of Kabardino-Balkarian republic