Архив сайта
Июнь 2018 (8)
Май 2018 (10)
Апрель 2018 (10)
Март 2018 (10)
Февраль 2018 (11)
Январь 2018 (12)
Календарь
«    Ноябрь 2018    »
ПнВтСрЧтПтСбВс
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ НА САЙТЕ
Какая страна, на Ваш взгляд, примет больше беженцев-черкесов из Сирии?
Российская Федерация
Соединенные Штаты Америки
Ни та, ни другая
СМС-помощь


Аслан Шаззо на сервере Стихи.ру


The Maykop town court satisfied today requirements of the ecologist Valeriy Brinih. He considers that zoning in the territory of the Sochi national park authorized by the order of the Federal service on nature using supervision (Rosprirodnadzor, Moscow) from August 27, 2006, was unlawful.

The second legal person, which decision had been challenged, was the expert commission of the state ecological examination involved by the order of the Rosprirodnadzor, he told “Caucasian unit" correspondent.

According to the applicant the mentioned litigation appeared to be one of the most difficult among ones that had been initiated by the ecologists, in particular, the Ecological Watch in the Northern Caucasus. "Even the brief announcement of all the circumstances and proofs occupied 12 pages of the claim statement", - he added.

During the national park’s zoning (that is translation of a part of the lands into other categories) the broke "Law about ecological examination", "Law about environment protection" and "Law about specially protected natural territories" - the ecologist said. Besides some norms of the "Land Code", "Town-planning Code" and "Civil Code" were broken, too.

While writing up the claim statement it was important to show in the court the volume and the mass character of the committed infringements, the interlocutor explained. Taking into account that the claim could not be satisfied partially. That is both the orders about zoning and about ecological examination, on the basis of which it was made, had been recognized completely void and cancelled.

New zoning, the ecologist also explained, was made like a kind of necessity for the Olympic programs. Actually there was the building of the territories with various cottages, camps, hotels - that is the private business. And the Olympic objects in them occupied hardly 10 percents.

"I have submitted the application to court on November 13, 2006, - he also told. - Then they hadn’t accepted it, so I had to address to the other instances, the Supreme court of Russian Federation".

The verdict of the court will be received by the ecologist on next Monday. However a cassation from one of the parties - respondents, in his opinion, it will be prepared anyway. "They will hardly surrender without a fight, - he said. - But the materials handed to the court, are so detailed, and the judge has observed remedial norms in so scrupulous way, that such cassation, most likely, will be unpromising".

NatPress

Опубликовал administrator, 22-10-2007, 19:16. Просмотров: 833
Другие новости по теме:
Litigation on Sochi national park in Adygeya Supreme court postponed
In Adygeya judicial decision on Sochi national park’s zoning is cancelled
To Maykop and Sochi UNESCO commission will arrive
Ecologist from Adygeya called journalists of Russia to help republican judg ...
First court session concerned construction of road to Lunar Glade passed in ...