Архив сайта
Июнь 2018 (3)
Май 2018 (10)
Апрель 2018 (10)
Март 2018 (10)
Февраль 2018 (11)
Январь 2018 (12)
Календарь
«    Ноябрь 2018    »
ПнВтСрЧтПтСбВс
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ НА САЙТЕ
Какая страна, на Ваш взгляд, примет больше беженцев-черкесов из Сирии?
Российская Федерация
Соединенные Штаты Америки
Ни та, ни другая
СМС-помощь


Аслан Шаззо на сервере Стихи.ру


The judicial board on civil cases of the Krasnodar regional court born on March 25 the decision for the benefit of Kharet Tesheva, representative of the small indigenous people of the Black Sea coast of Caucasus - Shapsugs. The applicant challenged definition of the Central regional court of Sochi, which had given up to her in acceptance of her cassation complaint to the previous verdict.

As the representative of the applicant Zaurbek Shu explained to “Caucasian unit" correspondent, at first the question had been about contest of inactivity of the Sochi Town Assembly and recognition partially invalid "Rules about Land Tax" in the town. However the court of the first instance to satisfy those requirements in complete volume did not begin.

"The applicant did not agree with the decision of the court, - he said, - and I as her representative sent a cassation complaint through a post office on December 13. Thus, the remedial terms of such submission were observed by me, as under the law this date is considered as the day of submission".

But the judge, according to the representative of the applicants, refused to accept the complaint for consideration on the ground that actually it was delivered to him on December 21. Though, by the mail notification, the letter appeared in the office of the Sochi court on December 18.

The question, whether could it be assumed that the Sochi judge simply did not know the rules of the law about the complaint submission terms, the interlocutor answered that could not be in any way. "They know it very well and remember the law", - he said.

The representative explained such "free" judicial actions with that the judges practically always remained inaccessible for the applicants. Even in such cases, when their refusal looks as a rough mockery of the law, they remain unpunished.

Quite the other thing is that the applicants had no any right on a mistake. And if all of them mistaken, then knowledge of the judges will be shown in its complete volume.

And judicial red tape, Zaurbek Shu said, actually appears for only few applicants. Only those who during the whole process were ever not mistaken. Otherwise refusal follows. Moreover, even deprivation of the right to address on that question to the court not only by an applicant, but also by other citizens.

The litigation of Kharet Tesheva in Sochi lasts since the middle of October, 2006, the representative of the applicant reminded. And during all that time her complaint was in essence considered only once – on December 3 of the last year, when the court had satisfied her requirements partially. The rest time was spent for finding out of the relations with the court of the first instance.

Thus the question was about the simplest things, he notified. By the federal legislation Shapsugs were named as the small indigenous people of Krasnodar Region. And the regional and Sochi legislation does not mention them anywhere.

NatPress

Опубликовал administrator, 28-03-2008, 17:04. Просмотров: 1413
Другие новости по теме:
Sochi officials are unpredictable in their inactivity
Unequal struggle in Sochi litigation concerned rightsof indigenous small pe ...
Krasnodar judicial board considered Sochi judges not rightin relation to in ...
Case about Adygs-Shapsugs’ natural rights grows as snowball
Sochi deputies cancelled privileges of peoples of North, Siberia and Far Ea ...